Adoration Of The Magi Essays - Adoration Of The Magi In Art

Adoration Of The Magi Essays - Adoration Of The Magi In Art Adoration Of The Magi Iconographical Analysis: di Nardo, Adoration of the Magi The painting Adoration of the Magi by di Nardo portrays the three Magi approaching the baby Jesus and the Virgin Mary. However, there is much more to it than just this familiar scene from Judeo-Christian lore. When approaching this painting in order to analyze it iconographically, it is necessary to first look at all aspects of the form. If this aspect is ignored, it provides for an incomplete analysis of the painting. Once this is looked at, the iconography of the painting becomes much clearer, and it is easier to compare the painting to the actual biblical text from which it was derived (Gospel of St. Matthew 2:1 2:12). When approaching the painting the first thing I noticed was the odd perspective. There are several vanishing points. Also, all of the figures seem to be placed on one plane. Because of this, the two figures that represent Jesus and Mary seem to be hovering weirdly above the ground. This, I believe, draws the viewers attention to these two figures, since they are the main focus of the painting. Due to the influence of my culture, I recognized the figures as Jesus and Mary immediately. However, despite this, there are a few indicators as to who the people represented in the painting are. When viewing the painting, it is obvious that the figures of mother and child are the main point because the gazes of all of the people in the represented center on the child, including the mothers. Also, the weird hovering effect also directs the viewers attention to these two figures. Both Mary and Jesus have halos, but this is not necessarily a distinguishing factor seeing as how there are also four other figures in the painting that have halos. However, the halo that surrounds the head of the baby Jesus has a slightly different pattern than those that the other figures possess. This lets you know that for whatever reason, this child is set apart from all other figures in the painting. So, even if the viewer is of another culture or religion and doesnt see the significance of the female i n the picture being clothed in blue and red, or the significance of the blessing position in which the baby is holding his hand, he can see that for some reason, this child is being distinguished from all other people in the painting. Another aspect of the form that draws your attention to the Virgin and Jesus is the triangular set up of these two figures along with Joseph and another Magus. The triangle that is formed has Mary and Jesus at the peak, yet again, drawing the viewers attention to these two figures and reinforcing the fact that they are of some significance. When comparing the painting to the text in the Bible that describes the same meeting of the Magi with the baby Jesus and Mary, there are several differences. There are certain things that I noticed that not only go contrary to the painting, but to popular cultures idea of this story. First, in the Bible, the Magi are referred to as, chief priests and teachers of the law. They were not kings as they are often referred to in Christian culture. In fact, in di Nardos depiction, all of the Magi are wearing crowns, showing this misunderstanding. Another thing that is assumed by di Nardo in his painting, as well as by popular culture is that there were three Magi. There is nothing mentioned in Matthew 2:1 2:12 that makes reference to there being exactly three Magi. What I noticed that might have lead to this misconception, however, is that the Magi brought gifts of gold, incense and myrrh. This is the only thing that I saw that could have lead to the belief that there were three Magi one Magus for each gift. There are also extra people in the painting whom I could not identify. There is no mention of anyone in the bible besides Jesus, Mary and the Magi. There is not even any mention of Joseph who is clearly depicted. Also, the gifts that the Magi are holding in the

Maria Tallchief

Maria Tallchief Dates: January 24, 1925 - April 11, 2013Known for: first American and first Native American prima ballerinaOccupation: ballet dancerAlso known as: Elizabeth Marie Tall Chief, Betty Marie Tall Chief Maria Tallchief Biography Maria Tallchief was born as Elizabeth Marie Tall Chief and changed her name later to Europeanize it for career reasons. Her father was of Osage descent, and the tribe was the beneficiary of oil rights. Her family was well off, and she had ballet and piano lessons from age three. In 1933, pursuing opportunities for Maria and her sister, Marjorie, the Tall Chief family moved to California. Marias mother wanted her daughters to become concert pianists, but they were more interested in dance. One of Marias early teachers in California was Ernest Belcher, father of Marge Belcher Champion, wife and professional partner of Gower Champion. As a young teen, Maria, with her sister, studied with David Lichine and then with Bronislava Nijinska, who in 1940 cast the sisters in a ballet at the Hollywood Bowl that Nijinska had choreographed. After high school, Maria Tallchief joined the Ballet Russe in New York City, where she was a soloist. It was during her five years at the Ballet Russe that she adopted the name Maria Tallchief. While her Native American background led to skepticism about her talent by other dancers, her performances changed their minds. Her performances impressed audiences and critics. When George Balanchine became ballet master at the Ballet Russe in 1944, he took her as his muse and protege, and Maria Tallchief found herself in increasingly prominent roles which were adapted to her strengths. Maria Tallchief married Balanchine in 1946. When he went to Paris, she went as well and was the first American-born woman dancer to perform with the Paris Opera, in Paris and later with the Paris Opera Ballet in Moscow at the Bolshoi. George Balanchine returned to the US and founded the New York City Ballet, and Maria Tallchief was its prima ballerina, the first time an American had held that title. From the 1940s to the 1960s, Tallchief was one of the most successful of ballet dancers. She was especially popular and successful as and in The Firebird beginning in 1949, and as the Sugar Plum Fairy in The Nutcracker beginning in 1954. She also appeared on television, made guest appearances with other companies, and appeared in Europe. Having been trained by David Lichine early in her dance education, she played Lichines teacher, Anna Pavlova, in a 1953 movie. Tallchiefs marriage to Balanchine was a professional but not personal success. He began to feature Tanaquil Le Clerq in key roles, and he did not want to have children, while Maria did. The marriage was annulled in 1952. A brief second marriage failed in 1954. In 1955 and 1956, she was featured at the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo, and in 1956 she married a Chicago construction executive, Henry Paschen. They had a child in 1959, she joined the American Ballet Theatre in 1960, touring America and the USSR. In 1962, when the recently-defected Rudolf Nureyev debuted on American television, he chose Maria Tallchief as his partner. In 1966, Maria Tallchief retired from the stage, moving to Chicago. Maria Tallchief returned to active participation in the dance world in the 1970s, forming a school connected with the Chicago Lyric Opera. When the school was the victim of budget cuts, Maria Tallchief founded her own ballet company, the Chicago City Ballet. Maria Tallchief shared duties as artistic director with Paul Mejia, and her sister Marjorie, also a retired dancer, became the schools director. When the school failed in the late 1980s, Maria Tallchief again became associated with the Lyric Opera. A documentary, Maria Tallchief, was created by Sandy and Yasu Osawa, to air on PBS in 2007-2010. Background, Family Father: Alexander Joseph Tall ChiefMother: Ruth Porter Tall Chief (Scots-Irish and Dutch ancestry)Siblings: one brother; sister Marjorie Tall Chief (Tallchief) Marriage, Children husband: George Balanchine (married August 6, 1946, annulled 1952); choreographer and ballet master)husband: Elmourza Natirboff (married 1954, divorced 1954; airline pilot)husband: Henry D. Paschen (married June 3, 1956; construction executive)daughter: Elise Maria Paschen (born 1959; poet, writing teacher) Education piano and ballet lessons from age 3Ernest Belcher, ballet teacher (father of Marge Champion)David Lichine, student of  Anna PavlovaMadame (Bronislava) Nijinski, sister of Vaslav NijinskyBeverly Hills High School, graduated 1942

Business Process Analysis and Recruitment Essay - 1

Business Process Analysis and Recruitment - Essay Example The problem with the current system of recruitment for Talent Seek is that it is extremely time to consume. The process takes so much time that most of the good and potential candidates get de-motivated and do not wait for the results and join any other firm. The delay in the recruitment process is because of the bureaucratic nature of work in which every decision is passed on through all the different tiers of the organization. As a consequence, other companies get the best available candidates and the clients of Talent Seek are left with the ordinary ones. The other problem is that there is a lot of redundancy in the recruitment process. For instance, the job description is forwarded to all the managers who have any direct or indirect link with the recruitment process. This is a major obstacle in the efficiency required for the process to work smoothly. What the consultants’ group would strive to achieve is that it will try to change the overall method with which the work is done. What the group has analyzed is that the bureaucratic style of management has led to delay in the recruitment process. The company needs to change the structure of the organization from being excessively documented to being quick, proactive and ever looking for opportunities. The main challenge is to find new and innovative ways to improve the organizational communication channels. Since the main purpose of Talent seeks is to facilitate the process of recruitments especially in public administrative organizations, it needs to be quick and efficient, something that is difficult to attain by the public sector, that’s why they hire the services of talent seek. But so far talent seek is the victim of the same problems which are faced by its customers i.e. the in-efficiency that arise due to the bureaucratic structure, for example, lots of paperwork, in-effective communication channels, lack of coordination and slow decision making. The organizational culture at talent seek is also a cause for its ineffectiveness. The employees at the organization show lack of willingness to find out new ways of organizational communication. This is typical in bureaucratic organizations; people have no motivation to perform better and efficiently.  

Lethal v. Non lethal weapons Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Lethal v. Non lethal weapons - Research Paper Example ra, weapons have not only failed to strengthen a nation’s position while dealing with such difficulties but suggest that it is too prudish to inflict any severe damage to enemies or accept casualties. This has given rise to legal challenge against the use of force which has given rise to unsympathetic propaganda. Lethal weapons are developed with increasing precision and lethality due to the rise of a global defense industry worth a multibillion-dollar. Justice against crime has become a matter of serious concern for the first world country as the fight back the use of lethal weapons to introduce non-lethal weapons such as â€Å"acoustic (bioeffects), chemical (pepper spray), electrical (stun devices and projectiles), kinetic energy projectiles (shot bags and ring airfoil projectiles), light (lasers, flashing bright lights), nets (baton launched, projectile launched), and fleeing vehicle interdiction (mechanical and electric/electromagnetic)† (Morehouse 1996). If non-le thal weapons are not considered secure then there seems no difference between the use of lethal weapons. But one might agree that there may be lesser damage caused to environment at large. If the defense industry continues to produce weapons on large scale spending billions and billions of dollars, then the humanity will have to look for other solutions to protect mankind against crime. Today many nations’ chief exports are weapons technology for both defense as well as offense. Many critics have suggested that the business of conventional weaponry should be re-channelized for a worthy cause. Educated people need to realize that in order to evolve into better specie one needs to move on a higher plane. It is for this reason that the non-lethal weapons technology and its application started to evolve. Consequently non-lethal weapons and technologies are defined according to their potential application at the tactical and strategic level (Morehouse 1996). The question which often

Iran Domestic Politics and Nuclear Choices

Iran Domestic Politics and Nuclear Choices Iran’s Military and Nuclear Capabilities Worldwide enthusiasm for Iran was elevated significantly in the late spring of 2002, when the presence of two nuclear destinations was uncovered and understood that Iran had assembled or was building everything expected to deliver enhanced uranium, which could fuel nuclear weapons and in addition nuclear reactors. A pilot uranium plant at Natanz and a business scale enhancement. Starting in March 2003, after disclosures that Iran had hidden nuclear work from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Agency has been researching Irans nuclear history (AbuZayyad, 2010). Iran was allegedly utilizing fortified materials and burrowing profound underground to store atomic parts with an end goal to secure them in the occasion of an assault. Open reports recommend Iranian offices are presently so profound underground just the biggest dugout buster sort bombs could harm them and the United States is the main nation that has these weapons. Iran likewise constructed a system of passages and redesigned its air safeguards to shield its atomic offices from conceivable assaults (iranwatch.org, 2012). Iran has likewise redesigned its seaward abilities. In November 2012, the Iranian Navy divulged two new submarines and two rocket-propelling warships. Prior, Iranian authorities had said they wanted to plan atomic controlled submarines, which could empower the naval force to keep the subs on watch for more periods and separations. This new ability is seen as a potential risk to the vital adjust in the Persian Gulf and, hence, to the United States and the West. Iran additionally can request its intermediaries in Lebanon, Hezbollah, and associates in Gaza, Hamas, to flame rockets at Israel from the north and south to rebuff Israel. The risk of doing as such is additionally intended to prevent Israel. Israel, in any case, has officially made clear that any assaults from Lebanon would be met with a serious reaction and the Lebanese government is not restless to be dragged into another war by Hezbollah. Correspondingly, Hamas may be hesitant to incite Israel to mount an expansive scale operation in Gaza that would further debilitate its position. In September 2013, Iran and Oman marked a guard collaboration accord; however, that is not prone to have an effect on Irans capacity to assault or protect itself (jewishvirtuallibrary.org, 2015). Politics behind the nuclear Program One of the focal incongruities about Iran is that its dubious atomic project has turned into a characterizing political issue, despite the fact that large portions of the programs points of interest stay covered in mystery. Tehran is open about its journey to get quiet atomic vitality to serve a populace that has multiplied subsequent to the 1979 unrest. Be that as it may the religious government intensely denies any enthusiasm for adding to an atomic weapon—even as it brags about its developing capacity to advance uranium, an ability that can be utilized to create power or for a weapons program (iranintelligence.com, 2015). Actually, Iran does not yet need to improve; following Russia is giving the fuel to the new reactor it manufactured in Bushehr. Tehran counters that it has the privilege to improve uranium as a signatory to the NPT. It additionally means to construct extra reactors and says it would like to be subject to remote forces for fuel. At the same time following 2002, global suspicions about Irans long haul plans have developed in light of disclosures by different governments or Iranian outcast gatherings that it has constructed mystery offices that could be utilized for a weapons program. The Islamic Republic has just recognized them afterward. Also, as of mid-2010, Tehran had still not gave full insights about its projects to the International Atomic Energy Agency, as it is likewise needed to do under the NPT (Barzegar, 2014). Iran seems to have needed to begin a mystery program for a few reasons, from its experience amid Iran-Iraq War to the way that five of the worlds nine atomic forces are close-by or on its outskirts. In the meantime, it likewise seems to have embraced a method of atomic supporting or keeping up the choice of a weapons project, while attempting to stay inside the atomic settlement. In any case, the divulgences somewhere around 2002 and 2009 about its mystery offices and the consequent worldwide weight have transformed the project into a major political issue at home. In the effectively strained environment after debated 2009 presidential races, Irans atomic system turned into a political issue that set the hardline administration against both moderates and the Green Movement restriction (Barzegar, 2014). Irans atomic weapons project was a piece of a more extensive endeavor to wind up more independent in arms and innovation in the 1980s. Progressively disconnected, Tehran attempted to gain arms to battle Iraq, which utilized substance weapons and had an atomic weapons program. The eight-year war was the Middle Easts bloodiest advanced clash. Irans atomic project was an outgrowth of this experience (Barzegar, 2014). The project might likewise have been a side effect of the grieved insurgencys inescapable requirement for authenticity and Iranian patriotisms journey for admiration and universal status. Tehran has long looked for access to atomic innovation for the most part as a key to improvement and a method for restoring its previous enormity as an inside of exploratory advancement. The religious government seems to have further dove in its heels because of a recognition that the outside world is attempting to deny innovation and oppressing a nation that—dissimilar to Israel, Pakistan and India—marked the worldwide settlement on non-expansion. The administration sees the universal groups manages as an assault on an establishing standard of the transformation, to be specific Irans autonomy from outside impact or intercession (Barzegar, 2014). Irans atomic system unfolded in setting of its general governmental issues. Since the 1979 upset, Irans political world class has long been partitioned over how the religious government ought to advance and what worldwide part it ought to seek after. Past expansive ideas, for example, autonomy, independence and social equity, agreement has demonstrated slippery even three decades after the Islamic Republics introduction to the world. The most fundament distinction is whether Iran ought to proceed as a progressive state willing to challenge the world, or whether it ought to settle down and turn into a typical state that plays by universal guidelines. The atomic issue is progressively an impression of this fundamental division. All through the programs initial stages, there had all the earmarks of being a general accord among the political world class about the need or right to continue. In any case, by 2005, the accord had all the earmarks of being disintegrating. Rival groups in Irans political maze started to scrutinize the atomic programs expenses and centrality to Irans improvement objectives. Irans atomic project had turned into a local political football (iranwatch.org, 2012). For general society, the atomic program additionally at first appreciated expansive prevalent backing since it guaranteed vitality autonomy and exploratory advancement. It was likewise prevalent in light of the fact that the administration delineated it as an attestation of Irans rights against remote haughtiness. Anyhow, the system has not been subjected to educated verbal confrontation or open discourse about its definitive objectives, the expenses, and the association with Irans different goals. Agreement closes where specifics start (iranwatch.org, 2012). The three phases of politics talks over nuclear Iran Phase one: Period of consensus1987-2002 The time of greatest accord on Irans atomic project spread over 15 years. The restoration of the shahs atomic system was at first introduced as important to broaden vitality sources. Atomic innovation was compared as front line for advancement and basic for any in regards to toward oneself force. Anyhow, the administration just displayed a method of reasoning for vitality; it did not recognize whatever weapons propositions it had. The system advanced gradually amid this stage, as Iran experienced issues of association and becoming acquainted with innovation that must be procured stealthily abroad. The United States, effectively careful about Irans weapons propositions, tried to square its entrance to any atomic innovation. Humorously, the administration may have gotten a support from cover United States resistance, which stretched out to the development of a light-water reactor at Bushehr that Washington had endorsed when the shah was in force. Irans endeavors to dodge worldwide restriction, which included buys from the Pakistan system run by Khan, were never talked about locally (essayforum.com, 2007). Phase two: Early controversy  2003-2005 All through this period, the nuclear system was largely a worry of Irans political elites. The Supreme National UN SC in fact went about as the body that mirrored all political propensities. Its choices subsequently professedly mirrored a national accord (iranwatch.org, 2012). The 2002 disclosure about Irans development of an undeclared improvement office at Natanz put Tehran on edge. The exposure agreed with United States worry about the spread of weapons of mass pulverization to maverick administrations and fanatic systems. To abstain from intensifying the issue, the reformist administration of President Mohammad Khatami won understanding in the Supreme National UN SC to meet global concerns midway. Iran consented to apply the NPTs Additional Protocol without confirming it, which allowed stricter universal assessments. It likewise consented to intentionally suspended enhancement for a restricted however unspecified time (essayforum.com, 2007). Irans following arrangements with Britain, France and Germany demonstrated useless and added to shared suspicions. With the United States military engrossed in Iraq, the danger of military activity against Iran subsided. However, hardliners who picked up control of Irans parliament in 2004 started scrutinizing reformists for being too delicate on the United States for trading off Irans hobbies. In 2005, recently chose President Ahmadinejad, upheld by Irans preeminent pioneer, started enhancing uranium once more. The arrangement with the Europeans was shut down (iranwatch.org, 2012). Phase three: Deep divisions2005-2010 Irans nuclear project has to be progressively political amid this stage. Starting 2005, both the official branch and parliament were overwhelmed by hardliners and preservationists. Both Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei utilized the nuclear issue to defame reformists, portraying them as defeatists willing to arrange away Irans hobbies. Their utilization of the nuclear issue as an instrument of fanatic governmental issues finished the stage when the nuclear project should be a national issue. In addition, verbal confrontation was effectively disheartened. Yet the nuclear issue steadily slipped from the hands of the tiptop to the road. Among hardliners, Ahmadinejads populist revives included regularly organized serenades for Irans nuclear rights. The president reported that Irans nuclear system was similar to a train without brakes, not vulnerable to redirection by outside weight. Slogans, stamps, banknotes and awards have to be substitutes for educated examination (essayforum.com, 2007). Two variables prodded extreme backfire and a response on the opposite side of the road. First, the United Nations forced a progression of U.N. resolutions somewhere around 2006 and 2010 that included correctional assents. The United States and the European Union forced significantly harder one-sided authorizations. For the Iranian open, the expenses of proceeded with resistance got to be progressively clear and muddled everyday life (essayforum.com, 2007). Second, Irans debated 2009 decision won by Ahmadinejad in the midst of across the board assertions of extortion started the biggest dissents against the administration since the 1979 upset. Another Green Movement resistance was conceived. Numerous progressives likewise had developing worries about the populist hardline president, especially his monetary blunder. Irans new political abyss rapidly started to play on the nuclear issue. Four months after the decision, Ahmadinejad consented to a United States supported interval assertion intended to facilitate strains and open the route for more extensive transactions on Irans long haul program. Pioneers

Wood Imagery and the Cross in Faulkners Light in August Essay

Wood Imagery and the Cross in Light in August  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚        Ã‚   It is nearly impossible to interpret Light in August without noting the Christian parallels.1 Beekman Cottrell explains: As if for proof that such a [Christian] symbolic interpretation is valid, Faulkner gives us, on the outer or upper level of symbolism, certain facts which many readers have noted and which are, indeed, inescapable. There is the name of Joe Christmas, with its initials of JC. There is the fact of his uncertain paternity and his appearance at the orphanage on Christmas day. Joe is approximately thirty-three years of age at his lynching, and this event is prepared for throughout the novel by Faulkner's constant use of the word crucifixion. These are firm guideposts, and there are perhaps others as convincing. (207) In fact, there are many more convincing Christian symbolisms, which, in sum, have led to Virginia Hlavsa's suggestion that in Light in August "Faulkner arranged his events and directed his themes to parallel the 21 chapters of the St. John Gospel" ("St. John and Frazer" 11).2    These symbolisms, however, stray from the text of Light in August and seek to unify the novel through biblical or mythic allusions alone. They attempt to answer the questions of how Light in August functions as a work of literature by avoiding the novel itself. Because of this, they each fall short of being a definitive interpretation of the novel. In Francois Pitavy's view, these critics do not base their interpretations on "methodical analysis." They do not "study each chapter or group of chapters to see how and why the spatial and temporal breaks occur" (2). Faulkner's use of Christian myths in Light in August has produced jagged paths for critic... ...uri State University, 1995. Gwynn, Frederick L., and Joseph Blotner, eds. Faulkner in the University. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 1959. Hlavsa, VirginiaV. "The Crucifixion in Light in August: Suspending the Rules at the Post." Faulkner and Religion: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha 1987. Ed. Doreen Fowler and Ann J. Abadie. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 1989: 127-139. -------. "St. John and Frazer in Light in August: Biblical Form and Mythic Function."Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 83 (1980): 9-26. -------. "The Mirror, the Lamp, and the Bed: Faulkner and the Modernists." American Literature 57 (1985): 23-43. Meriwether, James B., and Michael Millgate, eds. Lion in the Garden: Interviews with William Faulkner 1926-1962. New York: Random House, 1968. Pitavy, Francois. Faulkner's "Light in August." Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1973    Wood Imagery and the Cross in Faulkner's Light in August Essay Wood Imagery and the Cross in Light in August  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚        Ã‚   It is nearly impossible to interpret Light in August without noting the Christian parallels.1 Beekman Cottrell explains: As if for proof that such a [Christian] symbolic interpretation is valid, Faulkner gives us, on the outer or upper level of symbolism, certain facts which many readers have noted and which are, indeed, inescapable. There is the name of Joe Christmas, with its initials of JC. There is the fact of his uncertain paternity and his appearance at the orphanage on Christmas day. Joe is approximately thirty-three years of age at his lynching, and this event is prepared for throughout the novel by Faulkner's constant use of the word crucifixion. These are firm guideposts, and there are perhaps others as convincing. (207) In fact, there are many more convincing Christian symbolisms, which, in sum, have led to Virginia Hlavsa's suggestion that in Light in August "Faulkner arranged his events and directed his themes to parallel the 21 chapters of the St. John Gospel" ("St. John and Frazer" 11).2    These symbolisms, however, stray from the text of Light in August and seek to unify the novel through biblical or mythic allusions alone. They attempt to answer the questions of how Light in August functions as a work of literature by avoiding the novel itself. Because of this, they each fall short of being a definitive interpretation of the novel. In Francois Pitavy's view, these critics do not base their interpretations on "methodical analysis." They do not "study each chapter or group of chapters to see how and why the spatial and temporal breaks occur" (2). Faulkner's use of Christian myths in Light in August has produced jagged paths for critic... ...uri State University, 1995. Gwynn, Frederick L., and Joseph Blotner, eds. Faulkner in the University. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 1959. Hlavsa, VirginiaV. "The Crucifixion in Light in August: Suspending the Rules at the Post." Faulkner and Religion: Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha 1987. Ed. Doreen Fowler and Ann J. Abadie. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 1989: 127-139. -------. "St. John and Frazer in Light in August: Biblical Form and Mythic Function."Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 83 (1980): 9-26. -------. "The Mirror, the Lamp, and the Bed: Faulkner and the Modernists." American Literature 57 (1985): 23-43. Meriwether, James B., and Michael Millgate, eds. Lion in the Garden: Interviews with William Faulkner 1926-1962. New York: Random House, 1968. Pitavy, Francois. Faulkner's "Light in August." Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1973   

Establishing Ground Rules and Promoting Appropriate Behaviour

Establishing Ground Rules and Promoting Appropriate Behaviour When it comes to dealing with a new group of students, the first thing that one needs to keep in mind is that every student, as an independent individual, is unique and prone to acting upon and analysing certain situations in diverse ways. In order to come to a mutual understanding, certain arrangements on anticipated conduct within the classroom have to be made and maintained. According to Atherton (2011), these arrangements or ground rules are â€Å"the minimum necessary conditions for getting learning work done in the class†.So essentially, the ground rules are a pact concluded between the learners and the teacher; a pact that provides a greater understanding of the expectations as well as the needs of both the teacher and the learners relating to positive learning environment. There are various ways or approaches in which ground rules can be constructed. The concept of setting out rules is closely connected to t he idea of leadership – â€Å"a process of influencing the activities of†¦ a group of individuals in an effort towards goal achievement in given situations† (Bhatti et al, 2012).Consequently the approaches of ground rule establishment can be compared to three leadership styles, determined by Lewin, Lippit and White in their article Patterns of Aggressive Behaviour in Experimentally Created Social Climates (1939): a) authoritarian type, when the leader is making decisions independently with almost no contribution from the rest of the group, b) delegative or Laissez-Faire type, when the decision making is in the hands of group members, and c) democratic type, when the leader is allowing and encouraging the contribution from the members of the group.Every leadership style mentioned above could be implemented in the formation of ground rules in the classroom, the question is, however, which one of these would prove to be the most effective? On one hand, it can be deba ted that authoritarian approach could be beneficial – a set of clear, predetermined rules, provided by the teacher could give a good insight into the outcomes and certain regulations, that the learners would be expected to comply with. On the other hand though, this approach by its nature is not earner inclusive, which could result in the learners' reluctance to engage because of the dictatorial essence of the authoritarian approach. One can argue, that the delegative approach could be impactful, when working out ground rules, because the learners would be free to make independent decisions and set out their own standards. However, every educational establishment has a scheme of set policies and requirements that one has to hold by, which would mean that these policies would have to be included in the making of ground rules.Yet the learners might not be aware of these and therefore won't necessarily include those in their rule structure. Consequently, the Laissez-Faire approa ch might not be the right option. Common sense dictates that the democratic approach could be the best path to take. That way the formation of ground rules can be seen as a collaborative decision between the teacher and the learners. The teacher will be in a position to identify and establish particular rules that need to be in place, such as certain regulations, i. e.Health & Safety issues, or their expectations towards the learners, whereas the learners, in turn, will be able to address their preferences and requirements. This combined decision making can be achieved through group discussion or ice breaker activities, where different ideas can be proposed and afterwards either accepted or discarded. It can be reasoned that the advantage of this approach is the fact that the learners will be given a voice in decision making, therefore they will be more likely to respect and adhere to the set out rules.With an eye on creating a healthy learning environment, the established ground ru les need to promote and encourage appropriate and positive behaviour from both the learners and the teacher, both in and out of the classroom. In order to preserve this positive setting the teacher should place the emphasis on attaining an organic and well-handled atmosphere within the classroom, by encouraging creativity and enthusiasm in learners, recognising and praising success, flexibility in learning styles and approaches, as well as modelling of good and respectful behaviour, preventing any sorts of inappropriate conduct.In return, the learners should respect and appreciate the ground rules, be aware of their fellow learners and be able to consider and accept their needs, as well as to develop the sense of self discipline and responsibility. REFERENCES †¢ Atherton, J. S. (2011) Learning and Teaching; Ground Rules for the class [Online] Available from: http://www. learningandteaching. info/teaching/ground_rules. htm †¢ Bhatti, N. , Maitlo, G. M. Shaikh, N. , Hashmi, M. A. , Shaikh, F. M. (2012) The Impact of Autocratic and Democratic Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction, International Business Research [e-journal], 5(2). Available from: http://ccsenet. org/journal/index. php/ibr/article/view/14599 †¢ Lewin, K. , Lippitt, R. , White, R. K. (1939) Patterns of Aggressive Behaviour in Experimentally Created Social Climates, The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), p. 269-299